Workforce Injury-Prevention Scorecard
Most employers don’t have an injury problem — they have a prevention gap they can’t see. This scorecard walks through 15 questions across the six areas that drive work-related injury cost, then shows you where you actually stand and where your biggest opportunities are.
15
questions
~4 min
to complete
Instant
results
What it covers
- Safe Conditions & Hazard Control
- First Aid & Early Response
- Prevention & Ergonomics Training
- Hiring for Physical Fit
- Total Worker Health Integration
- Health Promotion & Wellness
How to read the scorecard
What your score actually means. The scorecard scores six areas: Safe Conditions & Hazard Control; First Aid & Early Response; Prevention & Ergonomics; Training; Hiring for Physical Fit; and Total Worker Health Integration, including health promotion and wellness. Most employers don’t score evenly. A typical pattern is strong hazard control — the plant is visibly safe, inspections happen, PPE is worn — paired with weak early response and hiring fit, which is where the cost actually enters: an injury that isn’t triaged in the first 24 hours becomes a claim, and a hire who was never matched to the physical demands of the job becomes next quarter’s recordable. Read your results area by area, not as a single number. Your lowest area is your sequence: it tells you which system to build first.
The six areas, in plain terms. Safe Conditions & Hazard Control asks whether hazards are found, owned, and closed on time — not just inspected. First Aid & Early Response asks what happens in the first hours after someone reports pain or an injury, and whether supervisors know the steps. Prevention & Ergonomics asks whether anyone has measured what your jobs demand of the body and acted on the highest-demand tasks. Training asks whether supervisors can recognize and escalate early signs of a musculoskeletal problem. Hiring for Physical Fit asks whether new hires are matched to measured job demands — for example with post-offer employment testing built on a job functional analysis. Total Worker Health Integration asks whether safety, wellness, and health promotion operate as one system or as separate programs that never meet.
What to do with your result. If one area is clearly lowest, start there — a single weak system will cap the return on everything else. If your lowest area is Prevention & Ergonomics or Hiring for Physical Fit, the underlying gap is almost always the same: nobody has quantified the physical demands of your jobs, so nothing downstream can be matched, tested, or defended. If your lowest area is First Aid & Early Response, look at your OSHA 300 log first — your repeat patterns will show you where early response failed. Two free next steps: the Injury Pattern Read turns three years of your OSHA 300 logs into a one-page read of your three injury patterns, and the Workforce Health & Risk Diagnostic goes to the source, assessing job demands, workflows, and indicators over two to three weeks and returning a 90-day roadmap. Neither requires the other; the scorecard simply tells you where to point them.
What is a good DART or TRIR rate for a company your size?
There is no single good rate. TRIR (total recordable incident rate) and DART (days away, restricted, or transferred rate) are only meaningful against your own industry. Compare your rates with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) incidence rates for your NAICS industry code for the same year, using the same formula — recordable cases x 200,000 / total hours worked. A rate below your industry’s BLS rate is comparatively strong; a rate above it, or rising over three years, is the signal to act regardless of the absolute number. Company size changes how much one case moves your rate, which is why the three-year trend matters more than any single year. TWHP’s free Injury Pattern Read already benchmarks an employer’s OSHA 300 log against the BLS rate for its industry, with the source cited — it is the fastest way to get this comparison for your own log.
How the six areas connect. These are not six separate programs; they are one chain. Measured job demands (Prevention & Ergonomics) make fair hiring possible (Hiring for Physical Fit). A worker hired into a job they can physically do, in a workplace where hazards are found and closed (Safe Conditions & Hazard Control), gets hurt less often. When something still happens, the first hours decide the cost (First Aid & Early Response), and supervisors are the ones standing there (Training). Total Worker Health Integration is the check that these pieces are being run as one system, with one set of numbers leadership actually reviews. A break anywhere in the chain shows up downstream as a claim — usually in a different department’s budget, which is why the chain so rarely gets fixed as a chain.
Score yourself honestly. Answer for what happens on your busiest site on your worst week, not for the policy binder. A scorecard answered aspirationally produces a maturity score you can’t act on; a scorecard answered honestly produces a sequence. If two or three people in different roles take it — EHS, HR, and an operations leader — compare the answers before you compare the scores. Disagreement between functions about whether a system exists is itself a finding, and it is the same finding the Workforce Health & Risk Diagnostic tests when it reviews alignment among EHS, HR, operations, risk, and executive leadership.